Array
(
    [_edit_lock] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1716962458:31
        )

    [tdc_dirty_content] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

    [tdc_icon_fonts] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:0:{}
        )

    [_thumbnail_id] => Array
        (
            [0] => 202701
        )

    [_edit_last] => Array
        (
            [0] => 31
        )

    [onesignal_meta_box_present] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [onesignal_send_notification] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [onesignal_modify_title_and_content] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [onesignal_notification_custom_heading] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [onesignal_notification_custom_content] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [_post_language] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [_molongui_author] => Array
        (
            [0] => guest-97695
        )

    [_molongui_main_author] => Array
        (
            [0] => guest-97695
        )

    [td_post_theme_settings] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:1:{s:11:"td_subtitle";s:78:"This in Global Royalty Trading’s case against wife of Datuk Seri Najib Razak";}
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_primary_category] => Array
        (
            [0] => 599
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_focuskw] => Array
        (
            [0] => Rosmah
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_linkdex] => Array
        (
            [0] => 61
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_content_score] => Array
        (
            [0] => 60
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_wordproof_timestamp] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [post_views_count] => Array
        (
            [0] => 301
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_arr] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:7:{i:0;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:1;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:2;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:3;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:4;a:3:{s:4:"date";s:10:"1751011610";s:5:"count";i:1;s:14:"per_hour_count";a:1:{i:8;i:1;}}i:5;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:6;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}}
        )

    [post_view_7days_last_day] => Array
        (
            [0] => 4
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_last_date] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1751011610
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_total] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

    [post_views_last_24_hours] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

    [post_views_last_48_hours] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

)
Rosmah fails to get police, Putrajaya named as parties in RM67.4 mil jewellery suit | Scoop
Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor is being sued by Lebanese jeweller Global Royalty Trading SAL over the loss of 44 pieces of jewellery. – Abdul Razak Latif/Scoop file pic, May 29, 2024
News

Rosmah fails to get police, Putrajaya named as parties in RM67.4 mil jewellery suit

This in Global Royalty Trading’s case against wife of Datuk Seri Najib Razak

Scoop Reporters
Updated
1:34 PM MYT

 

KUALA LUMPUR – Datin Seri Rosmah Mansor has lost her bid to include the Malaysian police and government as third parties to a RM67.4 million suit brought by Lebanese jeweller Global Royalty Trading SAL over the loss of 44 pieces of jewellery.

Kuala Lumpur High Court judge Ong Chee Kwan said police and the government did not owe Rosmah a duty of indemnity, but she was free to file a separate civil suit for any losses due to the actions of the authorities.

Rosmah is expected to file an appeal against today’s decision at the Court of Appeal.

The high court has fixed August 2 for case management, and June 2-6 next year for trial.

On March 29, 2023, Global Royalty filed a suit against Rosmah and claimed that she had lied by saying that 44 pieces of jewellery – including diamond necklaces, bracelets and tiaras sent to her by the company’s agent – were seized by the Malaysian authorities for offences under the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001.

According to the Beirut-based company, this was because only one piece of jewellery was kept by police and the remaining 43 pieces were not in the custody of the authorities.

Global Royalty, as the plaintiff, also claimed that Rosmah shifted the burden to the Malaysian government when in fact, the jewellery pieces were missing.

In her application to initiate third-party proceedings against police and the government, Rosmah reiterated that the pieces of jewellery in contention were not in her possession and had been seized by the authorities. – May 29, 2024

Topics

 

◉ Popular

A man with fire in his belly: Jagdeep remembers his father Karpal’s strength in the face of disability

Despite paralysis from a tragic accident, the DAP stalwart remained a fearless fighter—his legacy now upheld by his son

Daim’s lawyers slam police for ‘failing’ to probe PM over Bloomberg’s power abuse claims

Counsel for former finance minister question why news agency and reporters are being probed instead

Pendirian AGC konsisten, RUU GEG tidak berperlembagaan

Jabatan Peguam Negara secara konsisten berpandangan bahawa Rang Undang-Undang Kawalan Produk Merokok Demi Kesihatan Awam 2023 atau RUU Generasi Penamat (GEG) adalah tidak berperlembagaan (unconstitutional).

◉ Related

Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.