Array
(
    [_edit_lock] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1709206153:21
        )

    [tdc_dirty_content] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

    [tdc_icon_fonts] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:0:{}
        )

    [post_views_count] => Array
        (
            [0] => 271
        )

    [_thumbnail_id] => Array
        (
            [0] => 172838
        )

    [_edit_last] => Array
        (
            [0] => 21
        )

    [_post_language] => Array
        (
            [0] => English
        )

    [_molongui_author] => Array
        (
            [0] => guest-97702
        )

    [_molongui_main_author] => Array
        (
            [0] => guest-97702
        )

    [td_post_theme_settings] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:2:{s:14:"td_primary_cat";s:3:"599";s:11:"td_subtitle";s:82:"Three-member bench said veteran counsel’s case subject matter was not appealable";}
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_primary_category] => Array
        (
            [0] => 599
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_metadesc] => Array
        (
            [0] => The Court of Appeal here today struck out Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah's appeal against the high court's decision that disallowed him to file a counterclaim over the Inland Revenue Board’s (IRB) demand that he pays income tax arrears amounting to RM9.41 million.
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_content_score] => Array
        (
            [0] => 60
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_estimated-reading-time-minutes] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2
        )

    [_yoast_wpseo_wordproof_timestamp] => Array
        (
            [0] => 
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_arr] => Array
        (
            [0] => a:7:{i:0;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:1;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:2;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:3;a:3:{s:4:"date";s:10:"1749751355";s:5:"count";i:1;s:14:"per_hour_count";a:1:{i:18;i:1;}}i:4;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}i:5;a:3:{s:4:"date";s:10:"1749340417";s:5:"count";i:1;s:14:"per_hour_count";a:2:{i:9;i:1;i:23;i:1;}}i:6;a:2:{s:4:"date";i:0;s:5:"count";i:0;}}
        )

    [post_view_7days_last_day] => Array
        (
            [0] => 3
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_last_date] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1749751355
        )

    [post_views_count_7_day_total] => Array
        (
            [0] => 2
        )

    [post_views_last_24_hours] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

    [post_views_last_48_hours] => Array
        (
            [0] => 1
        )

)
Tax arrears: court strikes out Shafee’s appeal to file counterclaim | Scoop
In December, Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah was ordered by the high court to pay over RM5.5 million in income tax arrears to the Inland Revenue Board. – Bernama pic, February 29, 2024
News

Tax arrears: court strikes out Shafee’s appeal to file counterclaim

Three-member bench said veteran counsel’s case subject matter was not appealable

Bernama
Updated
7:28 PM MYT

 

PUTRAJAYA – The Court of Appeal here today struck out Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah’s appeal against the high court’s decision that disallowed him to file a counterclaim over the Inland Revenue Board’s (IRB) demand that he pays income tax arrears amounting to RM9.41 million.

A three-member bench led by justice Datuk Hanipah Farikullah held that Shafee’s appeal was incompetence as the subject matter was not appealable under Section 3 of the Courts of Judicature Act.

Justice Hanipah, who sat with Datuk Azimah Omar and Datuk Wong Kian Kheong also ordered the veteran counsel to pay costs of RM10,000.

Shafee was represented by Datuk Seri Rajan Navaratnam, Muhammad Farhan Muhammad Shafee and Wee Yeong Kang, while IRB senior counsels Norhisham Ahmad, Al-Hummidallah Idrus, Norzilah N Hamod @ Abdul Hamid and Muhammad Faqrol Syazreen Mohd Ghause acted for the IRB.

Meanwhile, Rajan told reporters that his client is at liberty to file a fresh suit.

On April 13, last year, the high court dismissed Shafee’s application to obtain leave to file a counterclaim after finding that the counterclaim does not arise from the recovery of taxes but from mala fide acts by the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Agency (MACC) and the Attorney- General’s Chambers (AGC), which does not fall within the set scope of the rule prohibiting counterclaim.

On December 21, last year, Shafee was ordered by the high court here to pay over RM5.5 million in income tax arrears to the IRB after allowing IRB’s application for a summary judgement against the lawyer.

IRB which filed the suit on May 6, 2021, claimed that the lawyer failed to pay the entire income tax arrears and the tax increase imposed on him amounting to RM9,414,708.32 for the assessment years of 2011, 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2016. – February 29, 2024

Topics

 

◉ Popular

A man with fire in his belly: Jagdeep remembers his father Karpal’s strength in the face of disability

Despite paralysis from a tragic accident, the DAP stalwart remained a fearless fighter—his legacy now upheld by his son

Pendirian AGC konsisten, RUU GEG tidak berperlembagaan

Jabatan Peguam Negara secara konsisten berpandangan bahawa Rang Undang-Undang Kawalan Produk Merokok Demi Kesihatan Awam 2023 atau RUU Generasi Penamat (GEG) adalah tidak berperlembagaan (unconstitutional).

Pengusaha bas ekspres, berilah kami diskaun atau harga khas: Pelajar IPT

Para pelajar IPT berkata permintaan mereka wajar dipertimbangkan kerana mereka antara yang paling banyak menggunakan perkhidmatan bas ekspres

◉ Related

Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.